North Fork Salt River Basin - Agriculture
hr1-g.gif (391 bytes)

The North Fork Salt watershed is a very rich source of agricultural products, produced for livestock feed (cattle and hogs) and human consumption. 

Five major crops dominate the area, corn, soybeans, wheat, sorghum and hay.  Corn, sorghum and hay may be used for livestock on the farm. Surplus is marketed for cash income.  Soybeans and wheat are grown exclusively for market consumption (cash income). 

2002  Census of Agriculture: Volume 1 Chapter 2:   Missouri County Level Data


Farms & Farmers

The size and number of farms in the six counties are shown below.

Farms and Farmers in the North Fork Watershed, by County, 1987-1997
County Category 1987 1992 1997 Averages for the Period
Adair Total Land in Farms (acres) 285,355 267,066 268,101 273,507.3
  Number of Farms 879 788 861 842.7
  Average Size of Farm (acres) 325 339 311 325.0
Knox Total Land in Farms (acres) 292,328 268,447 280,699 280,491.3
  Number of Farms 651 587 602 613.3
  Average Size of Farm (acres) 449 457 466 457.3
Macon Total Land in Farms (acres) 393,363 381,934 380,527 385,274.7
  Number of Farms 1,172 1,127 1,155 1,151.3
  Average Size of Farm (acres) 336 339 329 334.7
Monroe Total Land in Farms (acres) 329,889 306,175 328,200 321,421.3
  Number of Farms 953 833 886 890.7
  Average Size of Farm (acres) 346 368 370 361.3
Schuyler Total Land in Farms (acres) 156,208 165,225 159,543 160,325.3
  Number of Farms 498 488 493 493.0
  Average Size of Farm (acres) 314 339 324 325.7
Shelby Total Land in Farms (acres) 294,855 273,393 272,116 280,121.3
  Number of Farms 755 655 644 684.7
  Average Size of Farm (acres) 391 417 423 410.3

Land Use

The North Fork Salt Basin is a very rich source of agricultural products, produced for livestock feed (cattle and hogs) and human consumption. Five major crops dominate the area, corn, soybeans, wheat, sorghum and hay. Corn, sorghum and hay may be used for livestock on the farm. Surplus is marketed for cash income. Soybeans and wheat are grown exclusively for market consumption (cash income).
 
North Fork Watershed: Population and Land Use Percentage
County Schuyler Knox Adair Macon Shelby Monroe Totals Avg. by County
Category  
Population (2002) 4,212 4,385 24,946 15,497 6,681 9,262 64,883 10,814
Square Miles 308 506 567 804 501 646 3,332 555
Acres 197,120 323,840 362,880 514,560 320,640 413,440 2,132,480 355,413
1997 Acres Harvested Cropland 55,274 123,536 91,350 139,799 159,455 174,470 743,884 123,981
Pasture Cropland 42,088 51,647 62,542 79,038 35,680 43,243 314,238 52,373
Other Cropland 13,642 32,315 17,198 30,575 15,288 22,043 131,061 21,844
Woodland Pasture 6,587 11,098 16,382 22,102 12,549 14,438 83,156 13,859
Other Pasture 29,964 24,652 48,670 64,246 17,512 30,162 215,206 35,868
Agricultural 147,555 243,248 236,142 335,760 240,484 284,356 1,487,545 247,924
Non-Agricultural 49,565 80,592 126,738 178,800 80,156 129,084 644,935 107,489
Agriculture as a percentage 0.7486 0.7511 0.6507 0.6525 0.7500 0.6878 -- 0.6976


Types of crops grown may vary from year to year, depending on anticipated market prices, size, variety and productivity of the individual farm. Crops grown are limited by the availability of fertilizers, soil nutrients and/or livestock production. Careful decision-making in using fertilizers to increase a particular crop is required, as benefits may be limited.

Depending on the complexity of the farm operations, production of cattle and hogs can provide a source of income throughout the year. Some farmers attempt to find a balance between the production of crops and cattle: crops providing an annual source of revenue and cattle providing income throughout the year. Others may use purchased livestock feed to produce pork for marketing.

Technology plays a role in the development of strains and varieties of high yield crops, fertilizers, livestock and livestock feed. To minimize pollution, technical and informational assistance for livestock waste disposal and fertilizer applications is available at local extension offices http://www.mowin.org/countycontacts2/countycontacts.html


Livestock - Cattle & Hogs

Estimated Beef Cows, Milk Cows, and All Cattle and Calves, by County, 2002 - 2003
County Beef Cows (head) Milk Cows (head) Cattle and Calves (head) Value (thousands of dollars)
2002 2003 2002 2003 2002 2003 2002 2003
Adair 21,700 22,400 300 300 37,500 39,000 25,500 25,740
Knox 14,800 15,200 n/a n/a 33,500 34,500 22,780 22,770
Macon 24,500 25,500 400 350 47,000 48,500 31,960 32,010
Monroe 19,000 19,500 500 500 43,000 44,500 29,240 29,370
Schuyler 13,800 14,300 350 250 26,000 27,000 17,680 17,820
Shelby 11,400 12,000 50 50 29,000 30,000 19,720 19,800
Totals* 105,200 108,900 1,600 1,350 216,000 223,500 $146,880 $147,510
* For reported counties.
Hogs and Pigs, 1999
County Inventory
(head)
Value
Adair 5,000 $300,000
Knox 12,000 768,000
Macon 10,000 640,000
Monroe 56,000 3,584,000
Schuyler 3,500 224,000
Shelby 63,000 4,032,000
Totals 149,500 $9,548,000

Agriculture Business

An agricultural-related business is one that contributes to the objectives of the individual farmer. Such firms include –

  • Businesses, including cooperatives, that sell feed, feed supplements, seed, and fertilizers to farmers
  • Businesses that sell implements, equipment and related services to farmers
  • Businesses that buy corn, soybeans, wheat, sorghum, hay, cattle, and hogs from farmers for subsequent processing and sale to the market at large
  • Businesses that provide consulting and advisory services to farmers.

 Agriculture-related businesses in the North Fork Salt watershed area:

Agricultural Services:
Baring Farm Services, Baring, MO
Brennan, Nancy, Excello, MO
MFA Agricultural Services, Shelbina, MO
Midwest Organic Farmer Co-Op, Perry, MO
Northeast Missouri Farm Management, Monroe City, MO
Stewart Agricultural Research, Clarence, MO

Farm Equipment:
Antal Enterprises, Lancaster, MO
Atlanta Farm Supply, Inc., Atlanta, MO
Bright Enterprises, Paris, MO
Economy Salvage, Paris, MO
Edina Farm & Home Supply, Inc., Edina, MO
Farm & Home, Kirksville, MO
Farm Shop, Edina, MO
Garry G. Taylor Equipment, Greentop, MO
Golden Grain Systems Inc., Clarence, MO
Meyer Equipment, Monroe City, MO
Meyer Implement, Monroe City, MO
MFA Agricultural Services, Downing, MO
NEMO Equipment, Edina, MO
Shelby County Equipment, Inc., Shelbina, MO
Shelby County Implement, Inc., Shelbina, MO
Sydenstricker Farm & Lawn, Inc., Kirksville, MO
Sydenstricker Farm & Lawn, Inc., Macon, MO
Sydenstricker Truck & Tractor, Macon, MO
Tractor Supply Co., Kirksville, MO

Farm Equipment, Repair & Parts:
Black Crow Enterprises, Paris, MO
Elliott Machinery, Downing, MO
Harrington's Garage, Atlanta, MO
Harrington's Garage, Atlanta, MO
M & S Equipment, Green Castle, MO
Martin Repair, Green City, MO
Midstate Welding, Madison, MO
Steve's Garage, Brashear, MO
Young Farm & Repair, New Cambria, MO

Farm Supplies
Atlanta Farm Supply, Inc., Atlanta, MO
Orscheln Farm & Home, Macon, MO
Orscheln Farm & Home, Shelbina, MO
Orscheln Farm and Home, Shelbina, MO
Quinn Farm Supply, Inc., Monroe City, MO

Fertilizer

Fertilizers have played an important role by increasing crop yields over the years. Commercial fertilizers are a major source of nitrates.  Nitrate levels exceeding the public health standard of 10 milligrams per liter (mg/l; equivalent to parts per million for water measure) have been found in many drinking-water wells. The other major components of commercial fertilizer, phosphorus and potassium generally are not a groundwater-contamination concern.

Nitrate levels in drinking water above federal and state drinking-water standards of 10 mg/l nitrate-nitrogen can be affect human and livestock health.

To minimize ground and surface water contamination (seeping or spilling), proper fertilizer handling procedures are available at local extension offices. Other potential farm sources of nitrate are septic systems, livestock yards, livestock-waste storage facilities and silage storage.

Your drinking water is least likely to be contaminated if you follow appropriate management procedures or dispose of wastes at an off-the-farm site.  However, proper offsite disposal practices are essential to avoid risking contamination that could affect the water supplies and health of others. http://muextension.-missouri.edu/explore/envqual/wq0653.htm 

All Fertilizer Usage in the Watershed, 1950 – 1998, in Tons
Year Adair Knox Macon Monroe Schuyler Shelby Totals by Year
 1950  4,744 5,534 5,732 7,921 3,134 6,034 33,099
 1960  6,837 10,525 10,353 16,052 5,141 13,265 62,173
 1970  6,968 12,896 15,172 12,919 4,369 19,901 72,225
 1980  6,959 17,224 34,119 20,618 9,442 29,837 118,199
 1985  4,525 8,997 19,894 13,624 6,186 17,912 71,138
 1990  6,189 7,566 16,536 19,075 2,862 22,612 74,840
 1991  11,155 6,746 15,427 18,390 2,622 22,746 77,086
 1992  7,326 7,709 17,138 21,524 3,991 21,516 79,204
 1993  5,956 8,411 14,092 18,637 1,619 20,122 68,837
 1994  7,571 9,398 19,144 20,889 3,076 20,611 80,689
 1995  4,509 6,951 13,352 17,613 1,609 17,340 61,374
 1996  5,960 8,226 13,438 17,369 1,574 20,297 66,864
 1997  5,588 8,735 19,669 22,814 1,137 27,724 85,667
 1998  5,323 6,365 17,372 20,540 1,341 23,726 74,667
Totals by County 89,610 125,283 231,438 247,985 48,103 283,643 1,026,062

Predominate fertilizer sold by County, January 1 – June 30, 2001, estimates of tonnage:
  • Adair: Urea, 5,000 – 10,000 tons shipped in 2000, 3 permits for 2 distributors in fiscal 2000-2001;
  • Knox: Anhydrous Ammonia, 5,000 – 10,000 tons shipped in 2000, 3 permits for 2 distributors in fiscal 2000-2001;
  • Macon: Urea, 10,000 – 20,000 tons shipped in 2000, 7 permits for 6 distributors in fiscal 2000-2001;
  • Monroe: Ammonium Nitrate, 20000 – 50000 tons shipped in 2000, 7 permits for 3 distributors in fiscal 2000-2001;
  • Schuyler: Urea, 5 – 5,000 tons shipped in 2000, 2 permits for 2 distributors in fiscal 2000-2001;
  • Shelby: Anhydrous Ammonia, 20000 – 50000 tons shipped in 2000, 11 permits for 5 distributors in fiscal 2000-2001.

How is Water Quality affected by Agriculture?

Sediment is the highest source of pollutant in the North Folk Salt Watershed. Sedimentation results when rain transports loose soil particles from the land into creeks, streams and rivers and ultimately to the lakes. Sediments are deposited on stream beds and over time can impact food availability for fish or cause streams to dry - eliminating habitat for animals that live on stream beds, such as insect larvae, darters, fish and mussels.

Excess fertilizer leaches into the soil or is washed into streams via by rainwater. Some fertilizers are a threat to small animals that use streams for drinking water. Excess atrazine and cyanazine can affect human health.

Excess animal wastes wash into streams and rivers, threatening algae, the principal food supply of aquatic animals. Animal waste can also increase the amount of bacteria in streams, one of the most threatening of which is Escherichia coli, commonly called E.coli

When nitrogen and phosphorus are available in sufficient quantity, algae are able to grow and become food for consumers. This relationship between algae and nutrients keeps the quantity of algae and their consumers in balance. When excess nutrients are washed into a stream via fertilizer or animal waste, the algae population can grow beyond that which consumers can consume. Upon their deaths, they settle to the bottom of the stream and decompose. The process of decomposition requires dissolved oxygen from the water, and can deplete dissolved oxygen required by fish. Oxygen depletion threatens ability of fish to live and reproduce.


Keeping Rivers/Streams Clean

Farmers can assist in protecting the water in the North Fork Salt watershed using various strategies:

  • Use appropriate and approved fertilizer application techniques. Use proper techniques to dispose empty chemical containers. Assistance is available form local extension offices.
  • Trees and other vegetation along riverbanks can prevent sedimentation into streams/rivers. Soil acts to clean the water that passes through it. Riparian buffers - section of vegetation along the edge of streams – should be approximately 50 to 100 feet wide.
  • Animal drinking water directly from a stream contribute to streambank erosion and increased sedimentation. Defecating directly into the stream may increase the amount of bacteria in the water. Building watering tanks further from the stream can lessen streambank erosion sedimentation and bacterial contamination.

Index | Agriculture | Non-Ag Activities | Recreation | NPS | Plants & Animals | Water Quality
Physical | Hydrology | Drinking Water | Curriculum | Youth Activities


Elk River | James River | Sac River | Spring River | North Fork Salt River


Missouri Department
of Natural Resources

Missouri Watershed Information Network (MoWIN)
Send comments to: mowin1@missouri.edu
205 Agricultural Engineering
Columbia, MO 65211
Phone: (573) 882-0085
Toll Free: (MO only): 1-877-H20-shed (426-7433)
Fax: (573) 884-5650

Page last updated August 26, 2008